Some context, please
A pet peeve of mine: A report about associations (e.g., marketing benchmarks report) where the report defines associations by the number of members, but fails to discriminate between trade associations and individual associations. In other words, the report will talk about "associations with fewer than 500 members" as if a trade association with 450 members is somehow the same as an individual membership organization with 450 members.
I have worked with trade associations with fewer than three dozen members that had a budget and staff three times the size of a professional society with 2,500 members. I think you see my point; the number of members without context makes for pretty useless comparisons or benchmarks.
Just something to keep in mind if you're ever creating or reading benchmarking reports.
Wes's Wednesday Wisdom Archives
UI Matters!
UI Matters! Almost since I began consulting over 20 years, I’ve noted how important the […]
Be careful with absolutes
Be careful with absolutes When I speak with clients I try to be careful about […]
New Year’s Resolutions
New Year’s Resolutions Why do New Year’s Resolutions fail? Research suggests that part of the […]
Why Process is So Important
Why Process is So Important One of my favorite business authors is James Clear, who writes all […]
The Significant Change of SaaS Software
The Significant Change of SaaS Software One of the most significant technological changes in the […]
Always, ALWAYS budget for more training
Always, ALWAYS budget for more training Always, ALWAYS budget for more training. I don’t know how else […]
We’ve always done it that way
We’ve always done it that way A couple of weeks ago I wrote about approving memberships, […]
Are you sure it doesn’t do that?
Are you sure it doesn’t do that? Even after 20 years of consulting, I’m surprised […]
Be grateful
Be grateful As Thanksgiving approaches here in the US, I’m reminded of two words: Be […]
Do you really need to approve them?
Do you really need to approve them? I often joke that the very best (because […]