Some context, please
A pet peeve of mine: A report about associations (e.g., marketing benchmarks report) where the report defines associations by the number of members, but fails to discriminate between trade associations and individual associations. In other words, the report will talk about "associations with fewer than 500 members" as if a trade association with 450 members is somehow the same as an individual membership organization with 450 members.
I have worked with trade associations with fewer than three dozen members that had a budget and staff three times the size of a professional society with 2,500 members. I think you see my point; the number of members without context makes for pretty useless comparisons or benchmarks.
Just something to keep in mind if you're ever creating or reading benchmarking reports.
Wes's Wednesday Wisdom Archives
It’s all relative…
It’s all relative… Over the course of my 22 years of consulting, I’ve consulted with …
Eliminate to optimize
Eliminate to optimize So much of data management is habit (both good and bad) which is …
For data governance, ask “Why?”
For data governance, ask “Why?” Recently I’ve had the opportunity to work on several data …
More on Meetings
More on Meetings I’ve written before about the importance of making sure your meetings are …
Action produces momentum
Action produces momentum Another great quote from James Clear: “Motivation often comes after starting, not …
My #1 Best Practice…
My #1 Best Practice… A client recently asked me: “If you had to pick a single …
Encourage engagement with prizes!
Encourage engagement with prizes! One of the biggest challenges any organization faces when implementing a new …
Inertia
Inertia One definition of inertia is “to remain unchanged.” My sense is that many association processes, projects, or …
When’s the “least bad” time?
When’s the “least bad” time? When working with clients on a new project, especially a …
A poor launch can set the stage for YEARS
A poor launch can set the stage for YEARS It is not uncommon for me …