Data managers vs data consumers

Data managers vs data consumers

When I work with clients on any data management project, I'll often point out that there are two broad audiences on staff when it comes to the AMS: data managers (those who frequently use the system for processing data and financial transactions, querying, etc.) and data consumers (those who only use the data that comes from the system).

Both of these audiences are important but have different needs.

Data managers need a system that's easy to use, flexible, extensible, and comprehensive. They're processing data for all types of different activities, coming from multiple sources (e.g., back office, online, third parties). Data managers are often in membership, events, certification, and the like.

Data consumers typically need some subset of data that the AMS contains, either to communicate with that subset, or to do some form of analysis. Data consumers are often in government relations, advocacy, public relations, and marketing/communications.

Although they may have different functional needs from the AMS, they have one thing in common: both groups need quality data to do their jobs. Data managers need to be sure the right things are being sold to the right people or organization. Data consumers need to be sure they're talking to the right people and correctly communicating who and what their membership represents.

My experience is that data managers want a system with lots of functionality, while data consumers simply want to know that the data they need is being collected and is accessible when needed. Both of these things are possible from the same system, as long as you understand the needs of each group!

So whether it's a new system selection and implementation, or a data governance project, be aware of both groups, and be sure their needs are heard and considered throughout the project.

Wes's Wednesday Wisdom Archives

Start small

April 28, 2021

Start small When I work with my clients on projects that involve measuring member engagement, […]

Some context, please

April 21, 2021

Some context, please A pet peeve of mine: A report about associations (e.g., marketing benchmarks report) where […]

Eventually automated emails get ignored

April 14, 2021

Eventually automated emails get ignored During the discovery and development phase of implementing a new […]

The challenge the AMS providers see

April 7, 2021

The challenge the AMS providers see Over the years I’ve asked AMS providers what they […]

Be careful about “solutioning” too quickly

March 31, 2021

Be careful about “solutioning” too quickly One of the great things about software developers is […]

What’s our next action?

March 24, 2021

What’s our next action? As you can imagine, I spend a lot of time in […]

Don’t automate for the sake of automation

March 17, 2021

Don’t automate for the sake of automation I’m the laziest person in the world. I […]

Don’t forget about what got better

March 10, 2021

Don’t forget about what got better Negativity bias is the tendency to focus on only […]

Give a little at a time rather than taking away

March 3, 2021

Give a little at a time rather than taking away I’m sure there’s research somewhere […]

First, you gotta have the data

February 17, 2021

First, you gotta have the data When I work with clients on a new AMS […]

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top