Some context, please
A pet peeve of mine: A report about associations (e.g., marketing benchmarks report) where the report defines associations by the number of members, but fails to discriminate between trade associations and individual associations. In other words, the report will talk about "associations with fewer than 500 members" as if a trade association with 450 members is somehow the same as an individual membership organization with 450 members.
I have worked with trade associations with fewer than three dozen members that had a budget and staff three times the size of a professional society with 2,500 members. I think you see my point; the number of members without context makes for pretty useless comparisons or benchmarks.
Just something to keep in mind if you're ever creating or reading benchmarking reports.
Wes's Wednesday Wisdom Archives
“If I could only do one thing…”
“If I could only do one thing…” Managing data throughout your organization can be overwhelming. Do […]
Gratitude
Gratitude As Thanksgiving in the US approaches, I’m reminded of the importance of gratitude, in […]
“It’s more than I have, but less than I want.”
“It’s more than I have, but less than I want.” “It’s more than I have, […]
Don’t forget Parkinson’s Law
Don’t forget Parkinson’s Law “Work expands so as to fill the time available for its […]
Just Respond
Just Respond Growing up my father used to tell my many siblings and me that […]
People fear uncertainty, not change
People fear uncertainty, not change If you’ve ever worked on any big project that was […]
“Working with you is like going to therapy.”
“Working with you is like going to therapy.” I was working with a client last […]
The best ideas are stolen
The best ideas are stolen I don’t remember where I first heard it, but someone said […]
It’s all about expectations
It’s all about expectations One of the most critical contributors to the success of a […]
Either you test, or your members will
Either you test, or your members will If I was forced to choose the single […]