Some context, please
A pet peeve of mine: A report about associations (e.g., marketing benchmarks report) where the report defines associations by the number of members, but fails to discriminate between trade associations and individual associations. In other words, the report will talk about "associations with fewer than 500 members" as if a trade association with 450 members is somehow the same as an individual membership organization with 450 members.
I have worked with trade associations with fewer than three dozen members that had a budget and staff three times the size of a professional society with 2,500 members. I think you see my point; the number of members without context makes for pretty useless comparisons or benchmarks.
Just something to keep in mind if you're ever creating or reading benchmarking reports.
Wes's Wednesday Wisdom Archives
Customer vs. staff
Customer vs. staff In a properly designed AMS, when the customer goes online to your […]
Measuring customer service
Measuring customer service When I work with clients on AMS selection, one question that often […]
Iterate or innovate?
Iterate or innovate? When moving to a new association management system, there is often an implicit […]
Who is in control?
Who is in control? Speaking with a client once about their database project, the client […]
Sometimes Staff Has to do the Work
Sometimes staff has to do the work… As a child, I was attracted to computers […]
Documentation and the Great Resignation
Documentation and the Great Resignation Unless you’ve been living under the proverbial rock, you’ve heard […]
Data Management Strategy
Data Management Strategy Do you know what your data management strategy is? If you have […]
It’s always about trust
It’s always about trust When I work with clients on almost any data management project, […]
You can’t outsource buy-in
You can’t outsource buy-in One factor consistent with all of my most successful projects is […]
Use it or lose it!
Use it or lose it! I’m referring here to the data you collect. If you […]