If you don't trust your vendor...
When I start an AMS selection project with a client, one of the first questions I ask is: "Would you be willing to stay with your current provider if they can do what you need them to do?"
In most cases, the client says "no," because they've already decided they want to move to a new system (and that's okay). But every now and then, a client will say "Yes, if they can do what we need, we would stay with them."
But what I'm really asking the client is "Do you still trust your vendor?"
Because in the end, whether it's an AMS, LMS, FMS, or any other system, the product is only as good as the company that supports it. And if you don't trust the vendor, you won't be getting the most out of that system.
So look at all the systems you're using in your organization. Do you trust the vendor that provides it? If you don't, it's probably time to find a new one.
![]()
Wes's Wednesday Wisdom Archives
90% of your data is never touched a second time
90% of your data is never touched a second time I heard recently on a […]
Newton’s First Law
Newton’s First Law Part of Newton’s First Law states that “…an object in motion stays […]
No System is Perfect
No System is Perfect While it may sound trite, it bears repeating that no data management […]
Data Accretes
Data Accretes One of my very first jobs in the association world was managing the production […]
Don’t be so lazy…
Don’t be so lazy… One of the things that attracted me to the software world […]
Don’t try to do everything at go-live
Don’t Try to do Everything at Go-live When implementing a new AMS, there is a […]
Make sure your system has broad support
Make sure your system has broad support An AMS vendor pointed out to me recently […]
You have to have the right people in place
You have to have the right people in place This may seem obvious, but I’ll […]
Ask “What” not “Why”
Ask “What” not “Why” As a consultant, one of my favorite questions to ask my […]
Engagement is measured by the customer
Engagement is Measured by the Customer I’ve written a bunch about measuring engagement in the past. (Click […]
