Don’t move too quickly OR too slowly

Don't move too quickly OR too slowly

This may sound like a big "duh!" but I'll say it anyway: When it comes to selecting and implementing a new AMS, don't move too quickly or too slowly.

If you move too quickly, you are very likely to overlook things. During the selection process, this means overlooking functionality that you will need but hadn't thought to ask about. I've worked with clients who have come to me after selecting a system that they found out could not function the way they needed it to.

Moving too quickly during implementation manifests itself in taking things "live" before they've been thoroughly tested. And as I always tell my clients, either the staff tests before go-live or the customers will test after go-live.

Moving too slowly also has drawbacks. Moving too slowly during the selection process, especially when comparing multiple systems, can make it very difficult to remember which system does what, what systems look like, and so on.

During implementation, moving too slowly can result in a lack of focus by staff, dramatically increased budgets, and frustration from all parties.

What you're looking for is the "Goldilocks" speed. Fast enough that things don't bog down, but slow enough that avoidable mistakes aren't made. As a general rule of thumb, the selection process should be completed in three to four months, and the implementation process between six months and one year. Of course, this may vary dramatically for certain situations, but these are good guidelines to start with.

Remember: Not too quickly, but not too slowly!

Wes's Wednesday Wisdom Archives

The “S” stands for “Standard”

October 9, 2019

The “S” stands for “Standard” In a conversation with a past client, we were discussing […]

Is that meaningless data?

September 25, 2019

Is that meaningless data? I’m not a big quotes guy, but one of the few […]

Be aware of unintended consequences

September 18, 2019

Be aware of unintended consequences I’ve written before that every decision involves a trade-off. When […]

Positive change is harder to see

September 11, 2019

Positive change is harder to see Humans are wired to see negative change because we […]

MVP: Minimum Viable Product

September 4, 2019

MVP: Minimum Viable Product In product development there is a concept known as MVP, or […]

You always need a reason for collecting data

August 28, 2019

You always need a reason for collecting data When you ask for data from someone […]

If you’re unhappy, speak up!

August 21, 2019

If you’re unhappy, speak up! My clients will often ask me something along the lines […]

Does it advance the mission?

August 14, 2019

Does it advance the mission? Because associations are mission-driven, everything you do should be seen […]

How should you start a new data project?

August 7, 2019

How should you start a new data project? When you’ve got a new data project […]

A Data Integrity Report…for Reports!

July 29, 2019

I’ve written elsewhere about the value of data integrity reports. But one of the most […]

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top