Some context, please
A pet peeve of mine: A report about associations (e.g., marketing benchmarks report) where the report defines associations by the number of members, but fails to discriminate between trade associations and individual associations. In other words, the report will talk about "associations with fewer than 500 members" as if a trade association with 450 members is somehow the same as an individual membership organization with 450 members.
I have worked with trade associations with fewer than three dozen members that had a budget and staff three times the size of a professional society with 2,500 members. I think you see my point; the number of members without context makes for pretty useless comparisons or benchmarks.
Just something to keep in mind if you're ever creating or reading benchmarking reports.
![]()
Wes's Wednesday Wisdom Archives
Our Members Aren’t Tech Savvy
Our Members Aren’t Tech Savvy Having worked now in the association space for more than […]
Motion vs. Action
Motion vs. Action One key to successful data management is understanding the difference between motion […]
There is ALWAYS a Trade-off
There is ALWAYS a Trade-off I’ve written many times about trade-offs (you can read a […]
Little by little, a little becomes a lot
Little by little, a little becomes a lot “Little by little, a little becomes a […]
Why do we treat data management differently?
Why do we treat data management differently? A recent post on ASAE’s community read: “Looking […]
Don’t Forget Your Speakers!
Don’t Forget Your Speakers! A phenomenon I’ve noticed over the years is that my clients will […]
90% of your data is never touched a second time
90% of your data is never touched a second time I heard recently on a […]
Newton’s First Law
Newton’s First Law Part of Newton’s First Law states that “…an object in motion stays […]
No System is Perfect
No System is Perfect While it may sound trite, it bears repeating that no data management […]
Data Accretes
Data Accretes One of my very first jobs in the association world was managing the production […]
