Need data? Consider third-party sources
I always tell my clients, only collect data that you're actually going to use. A corollary to that rule might be "If you're really going to use the data, you don't have to collect all the data yourself; consider third party sources for data you need."
It's not unusual for my clients to want to collect additional demographic data on their members, or to want to know what the universe of potential members is, or any of a number of other data-related issues pertaining to their members or market. Often the instinct is for staff to try and collect that data themselves. "We'll just put together a quick online survey to find out."
My suggestion is that before you try to do it yourself, see if a third party data service already has that data about your members. There are all kinds of sources for data about individuals and organizations, ranging from government census data to privately collected consumer demographic information. And this data is collected at both an individual and organization level, so both trade and professional associations can benefit.
As usual, the first rule applies: Don't collect data you're not going to use! But if you do have need for data you don't have, consider third party sources as an alternative to collecting the data yourself.
Wes's Wednesday Wisdom Archives
The power of users groups! Last week I had the honor and pleasure of speaking […]
Associations are complex businesses! One of the reasons managing data at an association can be so […]
Snapshots are required Recently a couple of different clients have asked me why it’s necessary […]
“It’s in the database…” I often joke with my clients that AMS nirvana looks like […]
Using the Pomodoro Technique for data management I’m a huge fan of the Pomodoro Technique, […]
You need a PLAN to deal with duplicates Here’s the thing about duplicate records: No […]
Asking for more is a good sign… A client who had recently implemented a new […]
Take action… “The greatest wisdom not applied to action and behavior is meaningless data.” – […]
The Rule of 100 and 1,000 revisited I’m finding that the “Rule of 100 and […]