Measuring customer service

Measuring customer service

When I work with clients on AMS selection, one question that often comes up is: "How good is the software company's customer service?"

"Customer service" means different things to different people. For example, here are the customer service complaints I most commonly hear:

  • "They won't let me talk to a human. All issues have to be submitted via their ticketing system and I have to wait weeks for a reply."
  • "Every time I ask a question, they tell me they're going to bill me for the help."
  • "The customer service staff I talk to don't understand how we use our system and are never able to help us."

For me, the true measure of customer service is how the software company responds when they have objectively made a mistake. In other words, it's not the mistake I judge, but how they respond to it. Case in point:

I was working with a client on an AMS implementation. In the course of discussions with the business analyst (BA) during the implementation, the BA stated that an online portal for single sign-on (SSO) was available for a $5,000 fee. Hearing this in the meeting, I was a bit stunned, because I had recalled from their RFP response that the SSO was included as baseline functionality (i.e., no additional fee).

I showed the RFP response to the BA, who said "Let me check with my manager." A little while later he told us: "The salesman made a mistake in his response, but we will honor it and not charge you the $5,000."

The mistake was clearly theirs. But their response is how I measured them. They could have easily said "Sorry, that was answered incorrectly, you still have to pay for this," but they chose the correct path of honoring their word.

It wasn't the mistake I judged them by, but how they responded to it when it was pointed out. That was good customer service.

Wes's Wednesday Wisdom Archives

Write it down!

December 6, 2023

Write it down! If you’re in the market for a new AMS (or any new […]

Why “weeding the garden” is so important

November 30, 2023

Why “weeding the garden” is so important One of the most important activities for maintaining […]

It’s time to stop excusing association professionals

November 15, 2023

It’s time to stop excusing association professionals I worked in associations for nearly 10 years, […]

More demos is not better

November 8, 2023

More demos is not better When I work with clients on selecting a new system, […]

The database owner should be “passionate”

November 1, 2023

The database owner should be “passionate” I’m frequently asked by my clients: “Who should we […]

Discipline is required

October 25, 2023

Discipline is required Last week I discussed the importance of taking action. To manage data […]

Action is required

October 18, 2023

Action is required Over my many years of consulting, one thing I’ve noticed about many associations […]

Some data analytics tips from the DAN “Science Fair”

October 11, 2023

Some data analytics tips from the DAN “Science Fair” Last week I had the opportunity […]

Are all your processes frictionless?

October 4, 2023

Are all your processes frictionless? I’m not a huge fan of buzzwords, but I love […]

Trends don’t need perfect data

September 27, 2023

Trends don’t need perfect data When it comes to analyzing data trends (changes in data […]

Scroll to Top