You have to have the right people in place
This may seem obvious, but I'll say it anyway: All the best technology and all the correct processes can't fix people. If your staff won't do the work, it won't get done.
I've had clients in the past who struggled with getting their systems to work. They spent a lot of time and money on technology and reconfiguring internal processes. And yet they were still having issues.
Because the reality was that it wasn't the technology or the processes. It was the staff. Staff either wouldn't or couldn't do what needed to be done.
With people, if they can't do the work, training may help. It *may* help because it's also possible the staff just doesn't have the skills required.
If they won't, then they need to be removed from the process completely and replaced with someone who will.
Remember, it's people, process, and technology. You need all three to be truly successful.
![]()
Wes's Wednesday Wisdom Archives
Start with “Why” before you move to “How”
Start with “Why” before you move to “How” Something I’ve noticed over my years in […]
The power of users groups!
The power of users groups! Last week I had the honor and pleasure of speaking […]
Associations are complex businesses!
Associations are complex businesses! One of the reasons managing data at an association can be so […]
Snapshots are required
Snapshots are required Recently a couple of different clients have asked me why it’s necessary […]
“It’s in the database…”
“It’s in the database…” I often joke with my clients that AMS nirvana looks like […]
Using the Pomodoro Technique for data management
Using the Pomodoro Technique for data management I’m a huge fan of the Pomodoro Technique, […]
You need a PLAN to deal with duplicates
You need a PLAN to deal with duplicates Here’s the thing about duplicate records: No […]
Asking for more is a good sign…
Asking for more is a good sign… A client who had recently implemented a new […]
Take action…
Take action… “The greatest wisdom not applied to action and behavior is meaningless data.” – […]
The Rule of 100 and 1,000 revisited
The Rule of 100 and 1,000 revisited I’m finding that the “Rule of 100 and […]
