Positive change is harder to see
Humans are wired to see negative change because we need to protect ourselves; a negative change is seen as a risk and a danger. Positive change is much more difficult to see; there's no risk involved.
Think about it this way: When there's a negative change with your data (e.g., a board member's email address is incorrect), it is a problem, everyone knows about it, and often we rush to fix it. When there's a positive change (e.g., all the board members' email addresses have been updated and are now 100% accurate), we rarely notice, and it's even more rare that we say anything about it.
This is why I recommend that data managers practice database public relations. Because positive change is much more difficult to see than negative change, we have to make a proactive effort to highlight all the positive change going on around us.
Wes's Wednesday Wisdom Archives
Start with “Why” before you move to “How”
Start with “Why” before you move to “How” Something I’ve noticed over my years in […]
The power of users groups!
The power of users groups! Last week I had the honor and pleasure of speaking […]
Associations are complex businesses!
Associations are complex businesses! One of the reasons managing data at an association can be so […]
Snapshots are required
Snapshots are required Recently a couple of different clients have asked me why it’s necessary […]
“It’s in the database…”
“It’s in the database…” I often joke with my clients that AMS nirvana looks like […]
Using the Pomodoro Technique for data management
Using the Pomodoro Technique for data management I’m a huge fan of the Pomodoro Technique, […]
You need a PLAN to deal with duplicates
You need a PLAN to deal with duplicates Here’s the thing about duplicate records: No […]
Asking for more is a good sign…
Asking for more is a good sign… A client who had recently implemented a new […]
Take action…
Take action… “The greatest wisdom not applied to action and behavior is meaningless data.” – […]
The Rule of 100 and 1,000 revisited
The Rule of 100 and 1,000 revisited I’m finding that the “Rule of 100 and […]