Once is an accident, twice is coincidence, three times is a pattern.
We've probably all heard this phrase: "Once is an accident, twice is a coincidence, three times is a pattern." What this means is that when we see an actual pattern of behaviors or results (and not just random one-offs), there is an underlying issue to address.
Here are three areas where this applies to data management:
- Process change: When staff or customers consistently complain that a particular process is too cumbersome, it's probably time to revisit how something is done. In many cases I find that processes have been in place for many years without questioning whether all (or any!) of the steps in the process are still necessary.
- Possible bug: If we can consistently repeat a process that produces the wrong result (e.g., clicking a certain button always returns an error message) then we have a bug that needs to be addressed.
- Training issue: If we find that staff is consistently making the same error, don't assume ill intent, assume poor training. The staff person may be doing it the way he or she was (or wasn't!) taught. Correct the error with proper training.
Keep in mind that this is about pattern recognition. I would suggest not reacting immediately to a single error or complaint, but to look for patterns. If there is a consistent pattern, something needs to be addressed.
![]()
Wes's Wednesday Wisdom Archives
“Working with you is like going to therapy.”
“Working with you is like going to therapy.” I was working with a client last […]
The best ideas are stolen
The best ideas are stolen I don’t remember where I first heard it, but someone said […]
It’s all about expectations
It’s all about expectations One of the most critical contributors to the success of a […]
Either you test, or your members will
Either you test, or your members will If I was forced to choose the single […]
But are you really willing to change?
But are you really willing to change? When any organization is making a change in data management […]
Two tips for data conversion
Two Tips for Data Conversion I’ve written a lot about data conversion over the years […]
Who should “own” the database?
Who should “own” the database? One of the most common questions I get from my […]
What makes you weird?
What makes you weird? When I work with clients on selecting a new association management system, one […]
Why “AMS Consortiums” Don’t Work
Why “AMS Consortiums” Don’t Work About once a year I will get a call from […]
Your vendor will disappoint you
Your vendor will disappoint you I follow politics as a hobby. A past publisher from […]
