Why “AMS Consortiums” Don’t Work

Why "AMS Consortiums" Don't Work

About once a year I will get a call from an association executive who has partnered with one or more "similar" associations in search of a new AMS. The group of associations believes they can find one AMS to serve all of the members of the group, and by pooling their resources they can get more bang for their buck.

Sadly, I have to inform them that in my 22 years of consulting, I've never once seen this idea work. Here are just a few reasons why:

  1. No matter how similar the organizations are, their needs will be different enough that the system cannot be set up in just one way to allow the groups to manage their data successfully.
  2. Priorities for each association will be different. Some will want more power under membership, while others will want stronger event management, for example.
  3. No one wants to concede control of their database to someone else, even a group they've willingly joined.

These are similar to the reasons why there isn't just one AMS to serve every association in the world. The simple fact is different organizations have different needs, and different products have different strengths and weaknesses.

While most associations do most things in a similar manner, the reality is that most associations also do one or two or more things very differently from most other associations. We're all unique in our own ways, and that's why there isn't a single solution for every association.

As I like to say, "If there was one product that worked best for all associations, I would own it and be very rich."

Wes's Wednesday Wisdom Archives

But are you really willing to change?

September 22, 2021

But are you really willing to change? When any organization is making a change in data management …

But are you really willing to change? Read More »

Two tips for data conversion

September 15, 2021

Two Tips for Data Conversion I’ve written a lot about data conversion over the years …

Two tips for data conversion Read More »

Who should “own” the database?

September 8, 2021

Who should “own” the database? One of the most common questions I get from my …

Who should “own” the database? Read More »

What makes you weird?

September 1, 2021

What makes you weird? When I work with clients on selecting a new association management system, one …

What makes you weird? Read More »

Your vendor will disappoint you

August 18, 2021

Your vendor will disappoint you I follow politics as a hobby. A past publisher from …

Your vendor will disappoint you Read More »

Learn how to lose

August 11, 2021

Learn how to lose “Winning is great, sure, but if you are really going to …

Learn how to lose Read More »

Ownership is Required

July 28, 2021

Ownership is required When asked for the most common reason AMS implementations fail, I typically respond …

Ownership is Required Read More »

It’s all relative…

July 21, 2021

It’s all relative… Over the course of my 22 years of consulting, I’ve consulted with …

It’s all relative… Read More »

Eliminate to optimize

July 14, 2021

Eliminate to optimize So much of data management is habit (both good and bad) which is …

Eliminate to optimize Read More »

For data governance, ask “Why?”

July 7, 2021

For data governance, ask “Why?” Recently I’ve had the opportunity to work on several data …

For data governance, ask “Why?” Read More »

Scroll to Top