Measuring customer service

Measuring customer service

When I work with clients on AMS selection, one question that often comes up is: "How good is the software company's customer service?"

"Customer service" means different things to different people. For example, here are the customer service complaints I most commonly hear:

  • "They won't let me talk to a human. All issues have to be submitted via their ticketing system and I have to wait weeks for a reply."
  • "Every time I ask a question, they tell me they're going to bill me for the help."
  • "The customer service staff I talk to don't understand how we use our system and are never able to help us."

For me, the true measure of customer service is how the software company responds when they have objectively made a mistake. In other words, it's not the mistake I judge, but how they respond to it. Case in point:

I was working with a client on an AMS implementation. In the course of discussions with the business analyst (BA) during the implementation, the BA stated that an online portal for single sign-on (SSO) was available for a $5,000 fee. Hearing this in the meeting, I was a bit stunned, because I had recalled from their RFP response that the SSO was included as baseline functionality (i.e., no additional fee).

I showed the RFP response to the BA, who said "Let me check with my manager." A little while later he told us: "The salesman made a mistake in his response, but we will honor it and not charge you the $5,000."

The mistake was clearly theirs. But their response is how I measured them. They could have easily said "Sorry, that was answered incorrectly, you still have to pay for this," but they chose the correct path of honoring their word.

It wasn't the mistake I judged them by, but how they responded to it when it was pointed out. That was good customer service.

Wes's Wednesday Wisdom Archives

Either you test, or your members will

September 29, 2021

Either you test, or your members will If I was forced to choose the single […]

But are you really willing to change?

September 22, 2021

But are you really willing to change? When any organization is making a change in data management […]

Two tips for data conversion

September 15, 2021

Two Tips for Data Conversion I’ve written a lot about data conversion over the years […]

Who should “own” the database?

September 8, 2021

Who should “own” the database? One of the most common questions I get from my […]

What makes you weird?

September 1, 2021

What makes you weird? When I work with clients on selecting a new association management system, one […]

Why “AMS Consortiums” Don’t Work

August 25, 2021

Why “AMS Consortiums” Don’t Work About once a year I will get a call from […]

Your vendor will disappoint you

August 18, 2021

Your vendor will disappoint you I follow politics as a hobby. A past publisher from […]

Learn how to lose

August 11, 2021

Learn how to lose “Winning is great, sure, but if you are really going to […]

Ownership is Required

July 28, 2021

Ownership is required When asked for the most common reason AMS implementations fail, I typically respond […]

It’s all relative…

July 21, 2021

It’s all relative… Over the course of my 22 years of consulting, I’ve consulted with […]

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top