90% of your data is never touched a second time
I heard recently on a podcast that 95% of all the art New York's Metropolitan Museum of Art collects is never actually displayed in the museum. It's stored in a warehouse in New Jersey!
Which got me to thinking; how much of the data that we collect do we actually use? I would estimate that 90% of the data we collect never gets used more than once.
Think about it: most of the data we collect on a day to day basis is transactional. We track when Wes joined, when he renewed, when he attended a conference, which sessions he attended, and so on. The vast majority of transactional data is used for the transaction itself and then never touched again.
So what does this mean for data management? I think there are several significant implications:
- We need very clear and specific processes for collecting transactional data, so that the data is collected consistently and uniformly throughout the organization.
- We need clear data governance for identifying and managing the data that we will use again (beyond the transaction).
- We need clear policies in place for regularly cleaning/purging the database so that we're not continuing to store data that is no longer used.
I've written many times before that, because of technology, data is easy to collect and cheap to store. Data accretes. But managing data has a cost, even if that data is not being actively used. (Think of the costs involved for storing all that art no one ever sees!)
So be sure you have policies in place to regularly review the data you're managing.
![]()
Wes's Wednesday Wisdom Archives
But are you really willing to change?
But are you really willing to change? When any organization is making a change in data management […]
Two tips for data conversion
Two Tips for Data Conversion I’ve written a lot about data conversion over the years […]
Who should “own” the database?
Who should “own” the database? One of the most common questions I get from my […]
What makes you weird?
What makes you weird? When I work with clients on selecting a new association management system, one […]
Why “AMS Consortiums” Don’t Work
Why “AMS Consortiums” Don’t Work About once a year I will get a call from […]
Your vendor will disappoint you
Your vendor will disappoint you I follow politics as a hobby. A past publisher from […]
Learn how to lose
Learn how to lose “Winning is great, sure, but if you are really going to […]
Ownership is Required
Ownership is required When asked for the most common reason AMS implementations fail, I typically respond […]
It’s all relative…
It’s all relative… Over the course of my 22 years of consulting, I’ve consulted with […]
Eliminate to optimize
Eliminate to optimize So much of data management is habit (both good and bad) which is […]
