We've always done it that way
A couple of weeks ago I wrote about approving memberships, and how some associations make it far too complicated. (You can read that here.) It's a good example of "we've always done it that way."
Anyone who has been around for more than a few days has probably encountered this line. "We've always done it that way" is equivalent to saying "I don't know, that's how I was told to do it." (Which is also an answer I hear too often.)
The best way to respond to that answer is to ask "But why? Why do we do it that way?" If the why can't be answered, it might be time to trash the process itself.
So take a look at any process within your organization that doesn't make immediate sense, and ask "Why? Why are we doing it this way?" The answer might scare you (and you might be able to eliminate some time-wasting processes!).
![]()
Wes's Wednesday Wisdom Archives
Showing is not teaching
Showing is not teaching In my experience, when new staff members are taught how to […]
Data management is improvisation
Data management is improvisation I was listening to a podcast recently featuring TV writer Rob […]
Who own the AMS company is like the weather…
Who own the AMS company is like the weather… When I work with clients to […]
“As good or better than me.”
“As good or better than me.” I was recently speaking with a software developer working […]
Documentation is insurance
Documentation is insurance In a conversation with a client about their data management needs, the client […]
It all comes down to fundamentals
It all comes down to fundamentals I’m preparing for a webinar that I’m presenting in […]
Blog post themes over 20 years…
Blog post themes over 20 years… I’ve been writing blog posts for nearly 20 years […]
Lots of feedback is a GOOD thing!
Lots of feedback is a GOOD thing! A client in the middle of their AMS […]
Doing the reps…
Doing the reps… I’m helping a client with the implementation of a new AMS. During […]
Add one, remove one
Add one, remove one In the world of home-organizing, there’s the “one in, one out” […]
