Averages hide the extremes
I can't remember where I first heard it, but "averages hide the extremes" can be a really useful guide when thinking about how you manage data. Here's a nice illustration from one of my clients:
As they looked at their event registration they saw an average of 100 registrations per month over the course of six months. But a closer look showed that the first month of registration and the last month of registration was where the bulk of those registrations came in. In fact, if they removed the first and last month, the average number of registrations per month was actually more like 50.
The same also happens frequently with membership joins and renewals, certification, and other types of sales.
What this means is averages can be misleading. Basing a decision (e.g., staffing, technology, business processes) on the average number of transactions may lead to some choices that won't serve you well. So be sure to dig deeper when discussing averages.
And on a related note: Using the extremes (rather than the averages) can also be misleading because "extremes" is just another word for exceptions.
Wes's Wednesday Wisdom Archives
Why “weeding the garden” is so important One of the most important activities for maintaining […]
It’s time to stop excusing association professionals I worked in associations for nearly 10 years, […]
More demos is not better When I work with clients on selecting a new system, […]
The database owner should be “passionate” I’m frequently asked by my clients: “Who should we […]
Discipline is required Last week I discussed the importance of taking action. To manage data […]
Action is required Over my many years of consulting, one thing I’ve noticed about many associations […]
Some data analytics tips from the DAN “Science Fair” Last week I had the opportunity […]
Are all your processes frictionless? I’m not a huge fan of buzzwords, but I love […]
Trends don’t need perfect data When it comes to analyzing data trends (changes in data […]