The Rule of 100 and 1,000 and automation
I originally coined the rule of 100 and 1,000 in relationship to data conversion (here and here). I extended that rule to ongoing data management here.
The rule of 100 and 1,000 can also be applied to automation. Simply put, if you're managing fewer than 100 records for some process (e.g., accepting 50 submissions for an awards program), it's probably not going to be worth the effort to automate most of that process. But if you're receiving over a thousand submissions, you're definitely going to want to automate the process as much as possible.
In fact, for automation, I might adjust the rule to 100 and 500, especially if there are multiple steps in the process (e.g., submission, review, multiple communications with applicants, etc.).
It often doesn't make sense (in terms of time and money) to automate a process that can be managed manually. And definitely don't automate for the sake of automation.
The rule of 100 and 500 might help you decide whether or not to automate a process.
![]()
Wes's Wednesday Wisdom Archives
Why “weeding the garden” is so important
Why “weeding the garden” is so important One of the most important activities for maintaining […]
It’s time to stop excusing association professionals
It’s time to stop excusing association professionals I worked in associations for nearly 10 years, […]
More demos is not better
More demos is not better When I work with clients on selecting a new system, […]
The database owner should be “passionate”
The database owner should be “passionate” I’m frequently asked by my clients: “Who should we […]
Discipline is required
Discipline is required Last week I discussed the importance of taking action. To manage data […]
Action is required
Action is required Over my many years of consulting, one thing I’ve noticed about many associations […]
Some data analytics tips from the DAN “Science Fair”
Some data analytics tips from the DAN “Science Fair” Last week I had the opportunity […]
Are all your processes frictionless?
Are all your processes frictionless? I’m not a huge fan of buzzwords, but I love […]
Trends don’t need perfect data
Trends don’t need perfect data When it comes to analyzing data trends (changes in data […]
Start with “Why” before you move to “How”
Start with “Why” before you move to “How” Something I’ve noticed over my years in […]
